Student Solution

-->

"Education is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change the world”
– Nelson Mandela

1 University

1 Course

1 Subject

Download Solution

Related Solution

Discussion 5_1659071...
According to Bartlett, J (2019), “When parents, service providers, and programs employ a resilience framework to childhood trauma, they understand there are always opportunities to support positive de...

Discussion 5
Discussion 5

According to Bartlett, J (2019), “When parents,

Week 4 discussion_16...
Choosing the best topic for a persuasive paper is very essential because the quality and result of the paper are going to depend on the topic. Secondly, it is important to narrow it down and focus on...

Week 4 discussion
Week 4 discussion

Choosing the best topic for a persuasive paper is

Discussion (7)_16388...
Being a journalist in today’s world is not very easy because the world itself is going by through a big crisis. Journalists are pressurized by the hierarchy to go in difficult situation gather the lat...

Discussion (7)
Discussion (7)

Being a journalist in today’s world is not very

Module 5-Discussion

Module 5-Discussion

Q Most of us have goals and dreams. You probably have a vision of what the good life would look like for you. With this in mind, do you think pluralism would help you to live in a diverse society, one in which other people's opinions and lifestyles may clash with your pursuit of the good life? Does relativism offer a better or worse alternative? Explain your reasoning.

View Related Questions

Solution Preview

View Complete Solution
Pluralism would empower the presence of various convictions, philosophies, and societies. This would be useful to live in a different society since there would be such a significant number of common blends and mixes of individuals and foundations. Then again, individuals' assessments and livestyles could conflict since there would be such huge numbers of around. Relativism is an increasingly moderate methodology, since there aren't absolutes and this might be a superior option than having steady clash. Seen right now, bolsters harmony in pluralist social orders by enlightening clash as opposed to stifling it (Hing, 1993).