Student Solution

-->

"Education is the most powerful weapon which you can use to change the world”
– Nelson Mandela

1 University

1 Course

1 Subject

Download Solution

Related Solution

Week 3 Assignment 2_...
This week’s discussions were all very thoughtful and interesting. There are so many new things that I have learnt from this week’s works. As I was going through the details, I realized that my writing...

Week 3 Assignment 2
Week 3 Assignment 2

This week’s discussions were all very thoughtful

Discussion 3_1657785...
The organization that I chose for the final project is ACT Now, which stands for Afterschool for Children and Teens. ACT Now provides professional development support to afterschool program providers...

Discussion 3
Discussion 3

The organization that I chose for the final projec

Wright Discussion_16...
“The Man Who was almost a Man” by Richard Wright is an interesting short story that deals with the life and problems of an African American farm worker by the name Dave. The livelihood in the rural So...

Wright Discussion
Wright Discussion

“The Man Who was almost a Man” by Richard Wrig

Module 5-Discussion

Module 5-Discussion

Q Most of us have goals and dreams. You probably have a vision of what the good life would look like for you. With this in mind, do you think pluralism would help you to live in a diverse society, one in which other people's opinions and lifestyles may clash with your pursuit of the good life? Does relativism offer a better or worse alternative? Explain your reasoning.

View Related Questions

Solution Preview

View Complete Solution
Pluralism would empower the presence of various convictions, philosophies, and societies. This would be useful to live in a different society since there would be such a significant number of common blends and mixes of individuals and foundations. Then again, individuals' assessments and livestyles could conflict since there would be such huge numbers of around. Relativism is an increasingly moderate methodology, since there aren't absolutes and this might be a superior option than having steady clash. Seen right now, bolsters harmony in pluralist social orders by enlightening clash as opposed to stifling it (Hing, 1993).